Implemented Automatic Detection of chip counts and colors # 7 #25
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
Large
Medium
Small
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: david/poker-chips-helper#25
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "djwesty/7"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
This PR introduces an image recognition feature that allows users to take or upload a photo of their poker chips. The system detects chip colors and counts, displaying the detected values in an editable format for verification.
Great work. This was a tricky feature.
Ping me for another look after the tests are added.
I think it would be good to make this an
env
variable, like the API key.That way we can change the model on-the-fly easier
You can resolve this comment when done
Now that we have environment variables using
dotenv
, developers need to be aware of this so they can build and run the app locally. Since you may not have done this before, here is my suggestion.env.example
This file will might look similar toThe purpose here, is we force the developer to enter their secret key which is not committed, but also make it easy to uncomment/switch models.
.env
. Essentially we instruct the developer to copy the.env.example
with the new name.env
(cp .env.example .env
) and to paste their api key.You can resolve this comment when done
I stubbed these tests out before we traded issues, but now would be the time to implement some tests.
Tag me for here for another look when done
Can you give these new package additions a second look and confirm that we actually need them all.
These one, for example, do not seemed to be referenced by name in any components.
Sometimes that happens, but often it can suggest a package was added during development, but later not needed and should be removed again
You can resolve this comment when done
Sorry, I didn’t notice earlier! I’ll implement the tests now and tag you when they’re ready for review.
Yes, they’re not needed. I installed them while trying different approaches to implement the solution. I’ll remove them now.
Do you mean the link?
Thank you for your feedback